Feminists In Illogical Uproar After Former Playboy Model Decries Porn

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 6.30.58 PMFeminists are freaked out that Pamela Anderson and a rabbi recently spoke out against porn in a editorial. Pam even said that porno is corrosive to men’s souls, read about it here. Not only is it hypocritical that Pam Anderson is against porn, it’s equally hypocritical that so called “feminists” are so supportive of it. Perhaps the best thing that angry single feminists women can hope for, is to marry a porn obsessed men like Anthony Wiener.

In order to defend the honor of decent men like Anthony Wiener, the radical leftist publication Jezebel leveled an illogical attack on the “disputed” notion that men could be addicted to porn.

Check out a small slice of the craziness:

Implicit in Anderson and Boteach’s argument here, is that porn addiction is both measurable and treatable. In the op-ed, they draw a parallel between drug addiction and porn addiction, they even conjure up the ghosts of the phrase “crack babies.” The statistics from the American Psychological Association are correct, but the odd couple of moral crusaders leave out an important caveat in their discussion: pornography addiction, that specter haunting men, is not is a recognized disorder and is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

The research on so-called porn addiction is contradictory and experts disagree about what precisely constitutes pornography addiction or if it even exists. Anderson and Boteach conveniently sidestep a research that shows no corollary between chemical addiction and behavioral addictions. In other words, porn addiction is still controversial in the field, as is hypersexual disorder. That’s in part because definitions of addiction rely on establishing a norm and pornography is still bound to the kind of moral concerns laid out by Anderson and Boteach. What’s normal, then, is still determined more by culture and less by observable guidelines. By Anderson and Boteach’s account, the only “normal” consumption of porn is none at all.

This stuff always cracks me up. Insane, that they site the diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM), yes the DSM that used to classify homosexuality as a mental disorder! The DSM that feminists and the entire LGBTQ community went to war with is now the catechism of the progressive church. You better check the newest edition of the DSM to see if it’s OK if your husband sends pictures of his wiener to other women. Is that how it works for feminist these days?

Another hilarious line, “What’s normal, then, is still determined more by culture and less by observable guidelines.” Wowza, remember when cultural guidelines considered all sex outside of marriage to be abnormal? Progressives didn’t care much for cultural guidelines back in those days.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *